Although the laws regarding marijuana possession have been changing at a rapid pace it is still unlawful to sell marijuana in California.
Under Health & Safety Code 11359, it is illegal for anyone to possess for sale any marijuana, or any part of it.
If you are charged with illegally possessing marijuana for sale, the prosecutor must prove the following to establish that you are guilty under California Health & Safety Code Section 11359:
- You possessed a controlled substance;1
- You knew of its presence2; and you knew of the substance’s nature or character as a controlled substance3;
- When you possessed the controlled substance, you intended to sell it4;
- The controlled substance was marijuana5;
- The controlled substance was in a usable amount6.
There are 2 kinds of possession under this law. The first is actual possession, You have actual and/or exclusive control over the marijuana, you actually have it in your hand or on your person.
The other is constructive possession, You do not have to actually hold or touch the substance, to possess it. It is enough if you have control over it/ [or] the right to control it, either personally or through another person.
|Fine||$500 + penalty assessments||Up t0 $1,000 + penalty assessments|
|Probation||0-3 years iof summary probation||3-5 years of formal probation|
|Drug Offender Registration||No||Yes|
|Jail or Prison||Up to 6 months in county jail||Up to 364 days in county jail or 16 months – 3 years in state prison|
Below are possible legal defenses to a charge under Health & Safety Code Section 11359
If marijuana is found in your possession, and it was for your own personal use, then a skillful attorney can argue to the prosecutor that, the fact that the item was authorized means the possession of it is not illegal.
Under Health & Safety Code § 11359: possession is required. Therefore, if you did not actually possess, or even constructively possess the marijuana, then you have not committed a violation under Section 11359.
Under Health & Safety Code § 11359, you are required to have knowledge of the nature or character of the plant as marijuana. Therefore, knowledge is critical to this charge.
Under Health & Safety Code § 11359: The act of law enforcement officers or government agents inducing or encouraging a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead. Entrapment is an effective legal defense if the commission or encouragement of the criminal act originated with the police or government agents, instead of with the “criminal.”
Under Health & Safety Code § 11359: An attorney can show the prosecutor that they do not have enough evidence to convict you under Section 11359. This can be done with mitigating evidence or proof that not all elements of the crime were met by showing that the evidence submitted is either insufficient or insubstantial.
If you have been arrested and would like to learn more about how attorneys charge.
If you want to understand why its important to have an attorney represent you.
If you would like to discuss a pending case with an attorney contact the Aizman Law Firm at 818-351-9555 for a free confidential consultation.
- Constructive vs. Actual Possession. People v. Barnes (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 552, 556 [67 Cal.Rptr.2d 162]. [↩]
- Knowledge. People v. Romero (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 147, 151–153, 157, fn. 3 [64 Cal.Rptr.2d 16]; People v. Winston (1956) 46 Cal.2d 151, 158 [293 P.2d 40 [↩]
- The People do not need to prove that the defendant knew which speciﬁc controlled substance (he/she) possessed [CALCRIM 2352] [↩]
- Selling. People v. Lazenby (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1842, 1845 [8 Cal.Rptr.2d 541] [↩]
- “Marijuana” Defined under Health & Safety Code 11018 – “Cannabis” means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin. It does not include either of the following: (a) Industrial hemp, as defined in Section 11018.5. (b) The weight of any other ingredient combined with cannabis to prepare topical or oral administrations, food, drink, or other product. [↩]
- Usable Amount. People v. Rubacalba (1993) 6 Cal.4th 62, 65–67 [23 Cal.Rptr.2d 628, 859 P.2d 708]; People v. Piper (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 248, 250 [96 Cal.Rptr. 643] [↩]