A battery under penal code 242 is any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another1.
Below are 5 things you should know about California battery laws.
How Does The Prosecutor Prove Battery Under Penal Code 242
To prove that the defendant is guilty of battery under Penal Code section 242, the prosecution must prove the following facts or elements:
- The defendant willfully and unlawfully2.
- Used force or violence, or touched in a harmful or offensive manner3.
- The person of another4.
The touching does not have to cause pain or injury of any kind. The touching can be done indirectly by causing an object or someone else to touch the other person.
Justin was at a rock concert, when another patron threw a beer bottle in the air, hitting Justin on his head. The patron later claimed that he did not do it intentionally, as he was drunk and did not know what he was doing.
In this situation, the patron is guilty of battery. The nature of Justin’s injury will determine whether the patron committed a simple or aggravated battery.
If Justin did not suffer any injury or his injury was not serious, the court may determine that it was a simple battery under penal code 242. Conversely, if Justin sustained a serious head injury, the patron will be charged with battery causing serious bodily injury under Penal Code 243(d).
Moreover, it does not matter that the patron was intoxicated, because “voluntary intoxication” is not a defense to battery. Therefore, the act of throwing the bottle in the air will meet the “willful act” requirement for a battery conviction despite the fact that the patron was intoxicated.
Distinguishing Between Assault & Battery
Many people consider “assault” and “battery” to be the same offense, but they are two distinct crimes.
- An “assault” is essentially an attempt to injure another person.
- Whereas “battery” is the unlawful use of force or violence upon another person.
The distinction can be illustrated by the following example: a man with a severe case of road rage is provoked by the fact that a woman gets ahead of him in the freeway lane while entering the freeway.
Enraged to such a degree that he is determined to ram his car into hers, he speeds up and engages in threatening driving behavior by swerving closer and closer to her car as if he is going to hit her car. The woman is terrified of getting hit by the man’s car so she keeps swerving to the right to avoid colliding with his car.
Even though the man’s car never collides with the woman’s car, the man can be charged with assault under California penal code 240, because he engaged in the willful and violent behavior of attempting to collide with the woman’s car on the freeway and he has the present ability to carry out the threat5.
If the man’s car actually succeeds at colliding with the woman’s car, the man can be charged with both assault and battery. However, because assault is a lesser included offense of battery, he can only be convicted of one or the other6.
Legal Defenses To Battery Charges
If the defendant acted in self-defense or defense of others, he/she cannot not be convicted of assault. To assert this defense, the defendant has to have a reasonable belief that he/she or another person is likely to be physically harmed and is justified in using force that is proportionate to the threatened force to repel the attack.
Example: Ken was at a car wash when another customer attacked him. Ken did not know the man, but when he saw the man getting ready to punch him in the face, Ken quickly reacted by punching him first. Because Ken acted in self-defense and because he applied force that was proportionate to repel the attacker, he will not be convicted of battery.
This defense applies in a situation when the defendant does not willfully inflict force or injury onto another person.
- Car accident
- Accidentally dropping an object from a balcony that hits another
- An accidental bicycle collision
- Accidentally tripping or shoving someone in a crowded bus or crowded street
Consent is typically a defense to battery if a person engages in an activity where there is a widespread acceptance of the risk of battery. This usually applies to sports games or other inherently dangerous activities.
Keith is a baseball player and while at bat, a ball pitched by Joe hit him in the face.
Because baseball typically involves pitching and batting and both of these activities involve a degree of risk that the players impliedly accept, Joe will not be convicted of battery, because Joe will have a valid defense of consent.
Compare the above example to the next one where the injury is beyond the scope of consent:
Keith is a pitcher and while he was standing in the dugout in between innings, Joe, one of the players from the opposite team, came up to him and hit him on the head with a bat, because he was angered by the way Keith pitched in the previous game which resulted in a loss for his team.
In this case, Joe could be charged with battery because Keith’s implied consent does not extend to situations in which he is in the dugout in between innings.
Moreover, the implied consent does not apply to situations of intentional battery that does not involve game-related behavior. Therefore, Joe can be charged with battery.
Voluntary Intoxication – is not a defense to battery:
In California, a defendant who commits battery while intoxicated cannot claim voluntary intoxication as a defense. The reasoning behind the law is that defendants know (or should know) that alcohol and drugs affect mental functioning, and holds them legally responsible if they commit crimes as a result of their voluntary use.
Provocation – is not a defense to battery:
It is no defense to a battery crime that the defendant was responding to a provocative act that was not a threat or an attempt to inﬂict physical injury. Words alone, no matter how offensive or exasperating, are not an excuse for this crime.
An example to this is the hypothetical above when the man with road rage was provoked when the woman got ahead of him in the car lane while entering the freeway.
His violent reaction of trying to collide with her is not excused by the fact that he was unreasonably provoked by her actions.
Consequences of a Battery Conviction
Any battery conviction can result in severe penalties, possibly including jail time. If you are facing battery charges under California Penal Code 242, you may be facing the following penalties.
|Fine||Max Of $2,0007|
|Anger Management Classes||Negotiable|
|Firearm Ban||10 Years|
|County Jail||Not To Exceed 6 Months ((Id)|
Battery Against Elder or Dependent Adult: When a battery is committed against an elder or dependent adult, as deﬁned in Penal Code section 368 pc, with knowledge that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, special punishments apply. (Penal Code 243.25.)
Assault With a Deadly Weapon: California Penal Code 245(a)(1) pc provides that anyone who commits an assault upon another person with a deadly weapon or instrument other than a firearm, will be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for up to one year, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars $10,000, or by both the fine and imprisonment.
Domestic Battery: California “Domestic Battery laws” Penal Code 243(e)(1) pc applies when a battery is committed against any of the following individuals: spouse, a person with whom the defendant is cohabiting, a person who is the parent of the defendant’s child, former spouse, fiancé, or a person with whom the defendant currently has, or has previously had, a dating or engagement relationship, the battery is punishable by a fine up to $2,000, or by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. See Also Domestic Violence penal code 273.5 pc
Sexual Battery – California Penal Code 243.4 pc provides the law on “sexual battery,” which includes the non-consensual touching of another’s private parts for: (1) sexual arousal, (2) sexual gratification, or (3) sexual abuse.
Next Steps If You Need Help
If you have been arrested and would like to learn more about how attorneys charge.
If you want to understand why its important to have an attorney represent you.
If you would like to discuss a pending case with an attorney contact the Aizman Law Firm at 818-351-9555 for a free confidential consultation.
Request A Free Consultation
- California Penal Code 242., See California Legislature
- Someone commits an act willfully when he or she does it willingly or on purpose. It is not required that he or she intend to break the law, hurt someone else, or gain any advantage. Willful Deﬁned. Pen. Code, § 7(1); People v. Lara (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 102, 107 [51 Cal.Rptr.2d 402].
- The slightest touching can be enough to commit a battery if it is done in a rude or angry way. Least Touching. People v. Myers (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 328, 335 [71 Cal.Rptr.2d 518] [citing People v. Rocha (1971) 3 Cal.3d 893, 899–900, fn. 12 [92 Cal.Rptr. 172, 479 P.2d 372]].
- Making contact with another person, including through his or her clothing, is enough. Elements. Pen. Code, §242.
- Penal Code 240-Defined, An assault is an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another
- Pen. Code, §242; CALCRIM, No. 960.
- Elements. Pen. Code, §243(a). (“ A battery is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.”